also for viewing

check out my video haikus
and slideshow videos on youtube at "junahsowojayboda"


Thursday, February 8, 2018

the crooks of the matter 2/8/18

if issue or topic is the matter
then dualistic thinking is the crook
it is 3-card Monti by every perceptive means
for you’re asked to pick a card or make a decision
or have a perspective that feeds you a conclusion,
pick sides, choose winners, find fault,
have an opinion, certainly be positional.
you are expected to take a stand
based on what you perceive as an either-or situation.
you are seduced into choosing sides
to experience contention and be at affect of sidedness.
you are either a ‘for or against’
not realizing the hustle that has taken place.
capitalism depends upon this seduction for profit
fortune 500’s have to benefit either way
by good fortune or bad luck.
capitalization can work it both ways.
supply and demand looks to manipulate to benefit.
but the deeper principles that make this so successful
are the work of dualistic thinking,
perceiving the world as simplistic,
by creating contentious and opposing views.
fear is in over-ride in a for-or-against world view.
it is a planned hucksterism for success.
the news thrives on it.
movies flourish on themes of this nature.
myopia prospers by these as contentious means.
all of capitalism has heavily invested in psychology 101,
for it is never the product but always the perception of it.
branding in and of itself has gone on to psychology 201.
military is up to psychology 401 post grad learning.
politics is both theatrical and phd-skill-dependent on it.
think tanks breed it for fuel and product.
dualistic thinking is linear thinking at its superb best.
for it is an either-one-or-the-other view, solemnly taken.
that, as the big picture of things, is a con,
socially endorsed and totally a propagated shill.
syntactically this pits one against the other,
creates for false privacy, hidden agendas,
pompous projections, and the failure of government,
whose substantiated existence is dependent upon
dualistic thinking to promotes its cause and pleads.
every aspect of being relational
sells short any non-dualistic approach.
we falsely claim dependency
based on a dualistic perspective.
we commonly assume relationship dynamics
by dualistic premises
that actually are dysfunctional in nature.
this technique of thinking and subsequent thought
has many shortcomings that seem unaddressable
as if to put a fire with more fire
or drown a flood with more water
or ending a brawl by joining it first hand.
and so, without questioning,
dualistic thinking is prominent and unchecked.
most of the storehouse of retentive mind
is profoundly dependent upon it for method and approval.
one cannot talk past or beyond topic and be understood
as if it applies in the conversation as it exists.
for we only listen to reply
and not to understand the use of understanding
in each of its intended applications.
dualistic thinking has the presumption of fear-based
logic and pursuit, priorities and cause.
dualistic thinking features separatism as fact
and conclusionism as feature.
issueness is a form of reductionism
by dualistic language usage.
dualism does not create agreement
just agreement to agree.
interpretation and outcome are always suspect,
for positionality is strategized.
dualism thrives on sidedness as bottom line.
language in dualism is overwhelm of clarification
and underwhelm of tone as carriage.
thus we have music categorically as entertainment.
most act-outs in life reflect the nature of duality at work,
for the struggles of account and proof
and the projection of self within dualistic standards.
non-dualism is easily conceived as wacko-religious,
as some setting off far from logic for sure.
the entrainment is so strong
that non-dualism is inconceivable by most accounts.
consensus rules as if perception of life is a tug of war.
so to declare, what is the crooks of the matter
(once matter has become the seduction of topic? . . .)






No comments:

Post a Comment