a mirror is reflecting what we can see.
but a mirror is also reflecting what we can’t see.
a mirror is also reflecting how we can see
as also how we can’t see it.
but we can’t see that we can’t see.
we would like to believe there is no it.
we would question believing’s worth.
this dilemma assumes a we
but a mirror does not reflect the we.
we interpret the ‘we’ as the we,
but the mirror is both reflecting the we
and also part of the we.
we have yet to have the experiment of ‘we’
resolved . . .
how do we dissolve the ‘we’ to discover the we?
once again,
we are not this thought.
what thought is that? . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment