control, with its complete packaging,
is just a mind game.
it is in a world of mental equivalency,
presenting as real.
it exists where subject-object is the vacuum state.
a prudent separation, as a style of clarity,
is the assumed condition of existence
in order to function by this means.
there is a collective assumption
in the form of unassailable agreement presumed.
as, we each separately yet collectively agree.
we may, at some point, argue
about who is in control,
but we all seem to agree
to the functional premise of control as the means.
we species organize, based on control.
we claim entitlement presumed as in charge.
we are a consciousness collective
rather than a consciousness of one.
our tools of clarity and differentiation
keep us experientially isolated in that manner.
control has served no one
as a means of evolutionary advancement
of spirit and connectivity to the quantum of life.
yet we labor by these means
deeply buried in our assumptions of need.
we erred in our sense of being.
to this day, we primarily thrive on the grief
of that failure, as if an unrealized dream,
beckoned from within but not fulfilled.
we only have understanding as our means
and therefore, mental equivalency as our guide.
yet blatantly latent,
the spirit of oneness calls . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment