what the think 3/6/17

think is the opportunistic permission

but thought is the download.

we could live outsides the physical universe as think

but not as navigable thought.

by its very means, thought assigns substance as matter

and assumes its rules for operational attention apply.

think has void access,

referencing the quantum world as its operational

but thought, as it registers, steals and codes

to suit its version and account.

think, before it has words as language and labels,

ventures and immerses in an original sense

but returns and subscribes to thought

as its payload of worth.

thought-managed-think is a form

of a slave-to-reductionism style.

think, as a risk into words,

can come up with new concepts

but mostly in a ‘piggy-back

adding to what already is’, style.

the leap from think to thought is a given

without even the means to investigate

that internal migratory arrangement.

our conscious mandate is for think to register as thought 

and thought to be refined into value.

from before birth our imprisonment of consciousness

is on this take

and indoctrination towards that thought-cause

is thoroughly ongoing and without question.

as is, how to question questioning,

for us, is as a conundrum of itself.

the vibrational integrity of think occurs

at higher frequencies then matter does.

the transduction into an accessible brain state

seems to be unquestionable

but the results, as intelligence, are perceived as obvious.

birth and death are not the beginning or the end to think, 

but the thought trails are begging

and also of vacating relevance,

relative to life in the matter at the material stage.

the integrity of this vibratory means

has a non-physical template

and persists through form or eventually, the lack of it,

as in the material plane and also the non-material.

soul recognition does not occur by our thought-form means.

think has access to it

but it does not translate nor transduce authentically as such.

we makeup informational apparel to address it

and carry on with the projective form that is then recognized as such.

if per chance you truly connect with someone,

it is beyond your means to void them

or to even have opinions about them

beyond what is superficially pronounced,

for the connection is definitely not deeply altered.

in a world of vibrational intelligence you would, quote,

claim that you understand,

even though understanding is not

what is operational there as its means.

experience may seem to justify the connection

but it, that deeper connection with another,

goes on whether revealed in the physical realm or not.

where we have invested in a version of intelligence

does not allow us entry into that means of conveyance

as constantly relevant.

yes, we value it but only as high experience

in a phenomenological, accounting sort of way

and not as a constant or as a means  

that exists outside of the domain of time and space.

it is hard for us to trace back the origins of think

when our means is in a thought-account sort of way.

we have the same essential problem in science

because of its means and it accounting style

as if objectivity ever existed.

think is a trust, both as a noun and as a verb.

it refers to permission of spirit

but without any religious over or under-tones.

you are, as we all are, for now, the human pen

and your ink is filled with think.

signage, in the way it is done, is the imprisonment.

you essentially existed before the word,

before the word circumventively became your words . . .