dead 9/5/16

what is dead to us

is really a mirror reflecting us,

our perceptions, conclusions, and assumptions

as we relate to it in a subject-object manner

as with an objectified view as, “this is dead”.

The essentialness of it is that nothing is dead.

it’s our version of it, as by our methods

of experience and reality formats,

that we claim it to be so

and then we claim it to be, dead.

we go no further then the utility and futility

of our viewing style as relevant.

that it is dead means we have ceased to perceive

that it, as a livingness, is in a format

that we are either unskilled at knowing

or uninterested in

as a prop in our world story of being us.

so all of the dead to us

that we find, discover, claim

really represents our limited point of view

or avoided means of access to comprehend

beyond our sense of itness

or the actuality of it being in an energetic state,

not abiding by our limited range for sensing

in its transformation

outside of our realm awareness capacity.

in our journey toward all knowledge,

most of the eventual burden falls upon us

to find a means to participate more fully

in the grander scheme

than make up a human reality story

and come discover usable props

of our own dysfunctional intentions.

we are slaves to the natural universe

by the means we attempt

but proud of our accomplishments

by the stories we invent

and the telling we do

but only to ourselves.

Oh the universe is listening to us,

but not by the any of means of what we say . . .