also for viewing

check out my video haikus
and slideshow videos on youtube at "junahsowojayboda"


Monday, January 12, 2015

The beingness of one 1 of 2 1/12/15


True emotions cannot, in essence, be experienced.
The five senses, as they are currently developed and used, in a reality setting, are skillset trained away from higher vibrational octave interaction. Experience itself is a selective frequency addiction. The way our experience format is trained, literally, 24/7, uses methods and techniques that place us in a time continuum with symbolism and recognition skills that override a more subtle enterprise of field presence in an expanded sense of being. The seat of true emotions thrives outside of time. Our use of experience is at the fringe of this but in a time bound way. Intangible frequencies are at the higher end of the vibrational frequency range. The more complex the presentation of this, the less mass to demonstrate it with and the more improbable that the senses can conclusively provide a basis leading to an understanding in the way we do understanding of itself. There is no clear separation to any of this in the way we format mass and its location to itself because in this case, fields overlap and pass through each other without conflict or contrast evident to us. Just our attention on some thing that we reference
and assume as separate from us is not functionally the case. Our intention puts us in the mix without identifying that to be so since our level of conscious involvement is almost topical by nature because we assume sensory driven principles and linear logics that fundamentally don’t apply in these types of situations of interaction with the non-physical universe. From our lower vibration outset, notice is locational to start with.
Notice assumes boundaries that in the deepest sense do not exist but we are unaware in skills to sense that directly as part of what we do in those interactions. At higher vibrational frequencies, we struggle to make translational sense of what is actually happening from our experiential point of view. We are marginalized by our mass metaphor. We do a form of understanding that does not penetrate the essence environment but tours what we can grasp and return to our previous sensorial, metaphorical, experiential account, which takes us back to square-one assumptions and baggage that does not help with the translation or the transcendence we would hope to entertain as transformational and ongoing.

No comments:

Post a Comment