Consciousness is not a 101 * 3/19/14

Consciousness, as of the ‘now’, is a residue state. Experience, as a participation style, is the cause of that. If experience was not made of the clutter of results then consciousness would be a pure state. Experience is best developed so far, for lower frequency usage which we do basically 24/7. The higher the frequencies to experience, the more that vagueness of presence is introduced. Skills like depiction and account are less effective at these higher frequencies states. Experience has operational baggage that does not commute well into higher realms of awareness and the subsequent subtle experiences. We all take experience for granted at some deep level as an unquestioned given and as an operational tool much like the usage of a wheel. But experience is an elaborate and delicate weave, subjective to each person in varied and unique ways, not reducible to general terms in a refinement sense. Therefore consciousness currently, as we use it, is a fallback position as a hand-me-down from first person experiences. Based on experience, consciousness is an interpretive state of being and at higher levels, this is not so. At higher states of consciousness, there is astute immersion of being. There is less informational grasp and more vibrational immersion and advance. Consciousness is not experience. Experience is an interpretive state, contextually bound by feedback loops that seek a verification from informational, as a first order. Doing understanding is a path of replication that does not yields consciousness. We have developed an experiential baggage position as a journey preoccupation so as to return with evidence as a substantiation of our spectatorship and as proof of worth and marvel. Consciousness is none of those perspectives in true function. Understanding is not an evolutionary path, it is a mental equivalency position we claim as authentic. But we never left our mind state in doing so. That we generated language and topic and further interest is true but in doing so, we also agreed amongst ourselves to never leave our bleacher seats for the unknowable but ‘be-able’. We are vexed by our methods of approach, securing a status for our popularized reluctance to be a given in the evolutionary equation. It is not in our 2-strand DNA to go to the Promised Land and then return with an infomercial for recognition or profit. No one, in the essence of an orgasmic state, is there to return with evidence and proof positive as their number one important goal. Maybe there is a form of ‘pay-it-forward’. But our terms of engagement ask for idiocy to be a given in the process and the commonwealth of memory to be a currency of supreme value as in return. Understanding in this light, as an evolutionary path, is a dumb down of being into a doing format rather than a being format, that presumably can be deciphered to produce an impotency of effort to appear as a means of gain. Doing understanding is only a path of replication of consciousness to the degree the informational construct is developed, but it is not consciousness per se. Consciousness is an ‘isness’ as entry into a quantum coherent state of being. We have genuine access to this daily but more probably from dreams, blind-spot entry and the shadow states of being. Energetic truth is not logical nor sensible but truer to the core of what is deeply so and further possible. ‘High experience’ does not retell well. What was ambience in the room, in the retell, now becomes wallpaper to be appreciated from a bleacher seat. Language does not dimensionalize ‘high experience’ well. If there was a turn on in the retell, then the self-animation kicked in for what started out to be listeners and the telling then is a re-visitation with inclusion as immersion and that in itself becomes a quantum coherent state shared. But consciousness is not a 101 (study) . . .