Experiential logic is based upon
expected repeatable results.
The experience of change is
always topically a concern.
But there is a question
behind change always begged.
If discovery is of no real harm,
is change itself, an issue?
Change as perceived
always has alarm potential.
Change is always a way a ways
from the expected mindset pattern.
Change from consensual patterning
brings up the red flags of concern.
People have tended to wear
their skin of sensitivity
towards change in victim hood.
To wear the skin
of change as a constant
as if the intention was
to share in its goodness
is vaguely accepted.
Guardianship against change,
in this case,
has many allies towards protection.
The original premise of guardianship
across the entire experience spectrum
yields insulation,
isolation and separation
as strong methods of guardianship
and somehow
a justified need for protection.
Education by its method
does not teach how to witness change.
We all, as essentially starved,
live for the unexpected,
a broader sense of fluidity to existing.
But we lack the in depth training
to see the rules behind
change is change changing.
Business thrives on predictability
towards advantages of anticipation.
But our personal lives seem to be
stalled in cameos of self contracts
where by we are fixtures of habits
and contracted with others to do so.
Thus experiential logic pervades,
though we truly thrive
on an authenticity
that defies that logic
and risks for the wonder
of the moment
freshly offered and
consummately shared . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment