also for viewing

check out my video haikus
and slideshow videos on youtube at "junahsowojayboda"


Thursday, May 3, 2012

harboring as separates 5/3/12

Why is focus so

foreground and center

against background and surround?

What is focus a grip

of persistent attention,

that replaces every fading out

with a replenishing a new,

emptying every chance of fade

in an attending way.

Focus seems is filled with

an un-changing-ness

yet noticing every change?

Why is there

the naming of everything

as if recognition

is focus's approving bond?

Is it the motivational work

of a subtler physics

to have clearer images

and have them more sharply in frame

as the goal?

Is the effort

to possess a certitude

that any two separates

held together

under the right conditions

of objectification

can be seen

as linked to each other

and that a meaningfulness

can be squeezed out

of their juxtaposition

into a single congruent thought?

Is the justification for this focus rigor

that all things, being separate,

are but their referential potential

for being in focus frame

which then yields the linearity

for the story telling to follow?

Is this why our method

of self-consciousness

casts a myopia against

the holographic sight

of everything at once?

Is it that our perchance

of self-consciousness

projects a fear of personal overwhelm

if it was not for our methods

of observation

that give feature and frame

as optimal mindfulness

of our ongoing reality?

And if these separates,

as our namables, were dismissed

or somehow lost or wildly misplaced,

that there would be

nothing to replace their loss?

That there would be no substitutes,

no other contingency plans

to safeguard us and to follow?

Would there just be

that indomitable void,

overwhelming and unencumbered,

with no boundary or frame

and with no words

to adhere or reference it

as if it was dispensed

from a seamless sky

encompassing everything

as we commonly refer to it?

And by this failure at naming

or even naming it as the all,

would there then be an atrophy

of our minds as our godsend cure?

Would we not be able

to embrace the full emptiness

forthcoming?

For there would be

no perceived recognition,

as we have come to know it,

no photos to restore our memory,

no flash deja vu towards remembrance,

no boundaries for laying claims,

no brimming

with conclusion’s safe guard

no beaming with what I have to share,

and possibly, the worst,

no naming of the bliss

coming forth from within ? . . .

No comments:

Post a Comment