Our modeling is superficial
to those deeper needs
and our presentation tends to lack
authentic permission
for deeper self-intimacy throughout.
We realize a constant level
of separation and isolation
from where we would like to be
as a person, as a people, as a culture
and as a collective conscious community.
The need for intimacy is integral
within each person
but not acknowledged or evidential
in many situations.
For example,
we crave a kind of intimacy
yet we pursue a sexual relationship
afforded symbolic representation
and the appearances of exchange.
We profile for expediency
as a shortcoming
of not getting to know people
by any other means.
Our bodies are our roadmaps
of the imprinting and our subdued lives.
We live using them to give appearances
to normalcy, competency, indulgence
and over usage in reactionary styles.
We maintain a relative sense of being
by a value driven means
but do not acknowledge beyond that frame
what is really going on without taking,
what appears to be,
great private and personal risks.
We can come to claim
a type of social insanity
to more deeply investigate
a deeper sense of ourselves
than accomplishment would justify
but that is more of a resulting outcome
than an intended pursuit.
Life, in summation, can appear to be baffling
to discuss in the first person.
It seems that, in general, we accept topic
to be the driver of most of our attention
and content to be the means of participation
that addresses the core
of what appears to be going on
even though there are many other
contributing compositional levels
of human participation
to any moment in time.
No comments:
Post a Comment