The leaving

The leaving of all of us

in a quantum calling

is puzzling

for as long as ‘we’ are an ‘us’,

we are not together.

Quantum is not a descriptive.

Surely quantum has order

but not by the outside ordination

of rules.

There is no abstraction or concept

towards assistance that happens.

Isness, for us, is an initiation.

It is more than a leap of faith.

Isness is an organic participation

in the grandness of trust.

It is where we leave

construction or creation

as a separatist style behind

for the essence of being,

then manifest.

Quantum abides

by leaderless being

not by evidential doing.

If there are rules,

integrity is the collective manifesto.

Coherence is a spectator term.

Observation is several generations

removed from source

and obtuse to getting there.

The knowledge method

has baggage.

The knowing method

is schizophrenic

and there is an issue within

of self-corruption.

Discovery is a false claim

and subsequently a diversion.

Any of the techniques

of phenomenology

are respectable

but abusive frauds

of the original cause.

If quantum were to happen,

it would leave your lips,

your mind

as essence in isolation.

Anywhere you would take

your awareness

would make consciousness

a form of reductionism

to get back to here.

To go is to not come back.

If you did come back

in some baffling manner,

you would be a fractal

of yourself and humorously

beyond joyless joy.

You could make

your body represent you.

It would just be,

for those around,

a least interesting

and the least attractive

part of you.

And for the rest

of the quantum you,

we would all want to swim there

until we are the liquid of it

and not the want of it happening.

And we would not thank you then,

for our being and your being

would be the quantum

and you would have surrendered

beyond the quantum

identified as you . . .