The collusion in thought
is a perceived genuine myopia
as an accepted unconditional frame
and with that there is
the embellishment of nominality
as our primary task.
It is an overwhelmingly
popular orientation for sharing
in a definitive language way
but lacks soul depth perception.
To this end,
thought lacks any means
of empathic medium-ship
yet thought takes us to a residence
of informational proposition
commissioned by its own action.
There, in that light,
people are self-referenced
and subsequently identified
as if this is the distractive work
of a subjective/objective premise.
To me, all claims are subjective
at some levels
and objective at others.
There is nothing gained
by claiming one over the other
since they are each only descriptive
and certainly not ultimately
or exhaustively definitive in nature
and occur simultaneously
where one is in code for the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment