The invention of conclusions

The invention of a technique

used in thought process

that transitions the thoughts

from the thinking

into holding a specific thought

seized upon through time

as if it were held as a photo

yet also moving this photo

through time,

referenced as a constant.

A conclusion is a summation

and a reduction at that.

That any conclusion

is supposed to be maintained

in a mindful sense

to keep its effectiveness

as an awareness through time

even though the livingness

that it refers to

rapidly lives on,

migrating away

from the original take

now ever diminishing.

While the conclusion

is held constant

addressed eventually

as an assumption

that is made party of

a larger conclusion,

all of which becomes a backdrop

for the creation and digestion

of more conclusions

as if grazing the conclusions

was the primary task

to this method of observation.

With the inclusion of frame selection,

input of a language base,

and conversion to a symbol status

made referential,

this all adds up

to the apparent knowledge base

but lives in reaction as response

and give accounts

by conclusions restated.

Has this become

a preoccupation of the mind,

out of balance with the being?

Is this a frenetic tizzy of strategy

and then projection as performance?

Emotions are then

functional as criminals,

just for the experience of flavoring.

In a world

of change is change changing,

is consensus really all about

conclusions

just for subsidizing mental status?